Fast Way to Contact our Local Assemblyman

17 01 2008

EdVoice Website was established by our state’s leading educational philanthropists who understand  that the future of California will be shaped by the quality of education.
 
The website has a simple letter set up and it will localize which assemblyman to contact. All you have to do type in your name, address and of course with a little tweaking in the letter to make it more specific about California School for the Deaf. 
 
I suggest you to make a few changes in the letter before sending. From public schools, California schools, or schools to California School for the Deaf. 

Look at example below:

 
shared by Bridgetta Bourne-Firl and Jason Kulchinsky, parents and community members





Update: New Action Plan

14 01 2008

TRANSCRIPT OF “UPDATE: NEW ACTION PLAN”Hello. I want to inform you that today Jack O’Connell sent out an e-mail emphasizing his support and value of our school.He doesn’t want our school to close; rather he wants us [the Deaf community] to take action and protect the state budget.For the past few days we have been calling O’Connell’s office. We don’t have to do that anymore. Let’s shift our focus to Governor Arnold [Schwarzenegger].We need to tell the Governor to please not cut the state budget for education.You can contact the Governor at gov.ca.gov. After entering the site, scroll down to the bottom and click “Email the Governor”.In closing, I understand that you might feel that e-mailing the Governor will not make a difference. However, if we all do our part, it WILL make a difference.Thank you.Cat Cassidy,Parent of two Deaf children





Open Letter to Superintendent O’Connell

14 01 2008

Superintendent O’Connell,

Thank you for reiterating your support of the State Special Schools and all California schools. The Deaf community is equally passionate about education, and will be more than happy to join you in the fight to preserve (and increase!) educational funding for ALL children in California.

I would like to put last week into context. When the Deaf community was alerted to this particular radio interview, we had no direct access to the interview, and had the interview transcribed. Therefore, we had the interview at face value- we couldn’t hear or see the intonation in your voice & facial expressions. However, we did deduce that your intentions were noble and that you have the best interests of Deaf children at heart, but ultimately we were concerned with this interview reinforcing the current media narrative on Deaf education.

Unfortunately, the words that were used during the interview also triggered our 128-year-old fears of losing our home; our wonderful Deaf schools. For 128 years we have lived with the very real threat of Deaf schools being closed; a few at this date have been closed or radically altered. For 128 years the Deaf way of learning (ASL-English bilingual instruction) and living has been under constant assault by the auditory-corporatist industry that is primarily motivated by financial interests.

The auditory-corporatist industry, disguised as parent advocacy organizations, has an intense stranglehold on the quality of Deaf education here in America.

Ø By “quality of Deaf education here in America”, there is a direct connection between the auditory-corporatist industry and instruction. Check out “AG Bell Launches Collaboration to Expand Auditory/Oral Education in Los Angeles”, http://www.agbell.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?p=AG_Bell_LAUSD_Collaboration. It is my understanding that LAUSD has approximately 1,000 Deaf schoolchildren.

Ø I am also referring to the Children’s Legal Advocacy program, where they dole out financial support to families to sue school districts providing instruction in ASL to their Deaf children, http://www.agbell.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?p=CLA_Program. One case has already been won here in California, creating a dangerous precedent for the research-backed and quality ASL-English bilingual instruction for Deaf children.

Ø According to the Gallaudet Research Institute, 70.7% of Deaf schoolchildren in California come from families who do not “regularly sign”. 78.6% attend programs that do not use ASL-English bilingual instruction (29.3% “speech/sign” [no ASL] combined with 49.3% “speech only”). 75.9% are at non-Deaf school settings. http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/States/2005/CA.pdf

There is a clear correlation between low achievement scores and the educational philosophy/method of Deaf children. If 78.6% of programs serving Deaf children do not use ASL-English bilingual instruction, then it is safe to infer that these programs are responsible for most of the shamefully low achievement scores happening here in California. On top of that, with 70.7% of families not regularly signing with their Deaf children, the picture becomes painfully clear. Something needs to be done now.

And we wonder why and how all the above is happening, and has been happening for the last 128 years. How is it possible for the truth and research-backed instruction to be completely ignored, allowing the same mistakes to be repeated ad infinitum?

The answer is; the media helps make it possible for the truth to be shoved aside in favor of front-page stories that glorify unproven and substance-less programs that focus on Deaf babies’ ears rather than their brains and soul. For instance, just last week, this article made it to the front page. http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_7897148?nclick_check=1

When it comes to media, we frequently read articles about;

Ø The wonders of oral “education” and assistive devices, nothing about real and actual literacy scores and results

Ø How wonderful it is to “hear”, but not about learning everything and reading at grade level (which happens through ASL)

Ø Going to a local school with a team of ear “specialists” rather than a top-notch state school with qualified teachers & staff and where more than 80% of students pass the CAHSEE*

Ø The “hearing impaired” child that spends his/her day attempt to hear something, but nothing about the Deaf and VISUAL child that is doing well in English, literacy, and life

As you can see, after years of being bombarded with a false and misleading narrative in the media, the Deaf community takes the media very, very seriously. Our education and life depends on it. Hence our strong initial reaction to the radio

It is clear that a new & consistent media narrative founded in truth and not the auditory-corporatist propaganda is urgently needed.

You have always been a great ally to the Deaf community, and we appreciate your pointing out ASL’s benefits in your 2007 State of Education address, http://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/se/agdeaf.asp. We know you care about Deaf children, and we will continue working with you on closing the achievement gap among Deaf children and preserving CDE’s budget during this crisis.

We don’t want Deaf children to merely survive lousy education and lack of language; they should thrive in homes and schools with ASL & English. We want all Deaf children to thrive, not just survive.

Thank you,
David Eberwein
Deaf Community activist and a proud product of signing parents and a California state special school
*those with parents who sign ASL fluently

shared by David Eberwein, Deaf Community Activist





DCARA CEO statement

14 01 2008

I received this e-mail as a DCARA Board member and received permission to post this.

From: Diana Herron
Subject: Re: CDCAN REPORT #003-2008: CONSTITUTIONAL SPENDING CAP AMENDMENT AND MAJOR CUTS TO BE PROPOSED – NO DETAILS

I called Superintendent Jack O’Connell’s office to get clarification on the comment that he made on the radio regarding budget cuts and CSD. I spoke with Andrew Laufer who is a consultant for Dr. William J. Ellerbee, Jr., Deputy Superintendent overseeing the newly created School and District Operations Branch.

Clarification: Superintendent O’Connell is in favor of maintaining California School for the Deaf and he believes in Deaf Education.

His comment on the radio was worded in a way that is confusing especially to those of us who are more comfortable with ASL. He was trying to explain that the Governor has made a budget proposal for an “overall reduction to the State Special Schools (CSD is a part of the SSS) support and transportation.” Also, the Governor proposed a “major cut to classroom base – Prop 98 funding.” According to Mr. Laufer, Superintendent O’Connell sees that the Governor’s budget seems to favor prison services and reduction in education services especially for deaf and blind students.

Governor Schwarzenegger has made recommendations for proposals for cuts for every California State Departments including CDE, DOR, EDD, and DSS. So, what we need to do is to contact our legislators to voice our concern about budget cuts and how the cuts would negatively impact the quality of Deaf and Hard of Hearing people’s lives.

Diana Herron
Chief Executive Officer
Deaf Counseling, Advocacy and Referral Agency (DCARA)
14895 E. 14th Street, Suite 200
San Leandro, CA 94578
(510) 483-0759 VP
12.155.182.211 IP
(510) 483-0718 Voice
(510) 483-1790 Fax
To subscribe to DCARA’s e-newsletter, sign up at http://www.dcara.org/email , and to make an online donation via credit card, visit http://www.dcara.org/donate .

Shared by Jenny Cantrell, a DCARA Board member, an alum, and a community member





Message from Jack O’ Connell

14 01 2008

Please share this email with any of your staff, parents or community members who may have contacted you about Superintendent O’Connell’s comments during his radio interview on Thursday, January 10. Thank you.

>>> Jack O’Connell 1/11/2008 5:25 PM >>>

In response to concerns raised about my comments to the media regarding our State Special Schools and the Governor’s proposed budget, I am sending you this note to clarify my position. The budget cuts Governor Schwarzenegger has proposed to the State Special Schools will have grave consequences if they prevail. The intent of my comments is to suggest the seriousness of the budget situation and to encourage the public to notify their legislators and the Governor of their concerns.
 
Let me assure you of my continued passionate support for the State Special Schools and all California schools. I will continue to fight any cuts to education.
 
Sincerely,
 JACK O’CONNELLState Superintendent of Public Instruction




More Action Plans

14 01 2008

San Francisco Chronicle published an article on January 13, 2008; Governor’s budget aims to curb spending mandates by Tom Chorneau. The article mentioned a few things that we all should be aware of. It is about Jack O’Connell stance on how our governors are going in wrong directions by cutting budgets in the education arena. Later in the article, there were suggestions for us to contact variety governors in our state to express our opinions on cutting the education budget. I strongly suggest us to contact different governors and make them listen to our concerns than weighting our issues on a person, Jack O’Connell.

Excerpt from Governor’s budget aims to curb spending mandates

To comment on the governor’s proposed budget, contact:

— Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Sacramento office (916) 445-2841; San Francisco office (415) 703-2218; e-mail from the governor’s Web site at gov.ca.gov.

— Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles: Sacramento office (916) 319-2046; e-mail speaker.nunez@assem bly.ca.gov.

— Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland: Sacramento office (916) 651-4009; district office (510) 286-1333; e-mail senator.perata@sen.ca.gov.

— Senate Republican leader Dick Ackerman of Irvine (Orange County): Sacramento office (916) 651-4033; e-mail senator.ack erman@sen.ca.gov.

— Assembly Republican leader Mike Villines of Clovis (Fresno County): Sacramento office (916) 319-2029; e-mail assem blymember.villines@assembly.ca.gov.

 

shared by Jason Kulchinsky, parent and community member





Calm, respectful action is a MUST

13 01 2008

Hi, everyone.

A few comments have asked for clarification, a suggestion to wait, and so on. We assure you that we are not encouraging people to panic, to rashly call O’Connell’s office and leave an angry message, or anything of that nature.

We fully acknowledge the possibility that this is simply a political ploy, therefore, we need to tread with care. But do we really want to take that chance and wait? The budget crisis is a very real and serious one. There are ways to argue successfully that downsizing the State Special Schools is a smart financial move, but I’m not going to make the mistake of outlining those here. *grin* What we (as in all of us community members out there) need to do is to get in touch with O’Connell’s office, but to do it with tact and reason. We do not want to alienate him, you’re right. We do, however, need to send the message that CSD is valuable and should be left alone with a minimum of damage from the budget ax. There’s nothing wrong/dangerous about going ahead and placing a tactful call, saying that you want to keep CSD without downsizing in any way, and encouraging others to do the same.
This is a multi-pronged approach, and we’re doing everything we can, including some of what you’ve suggested, but for various reasons, including job security for some of us, we can’t outline those here.

For those of you who are urging caution or waiting, there is nothing wrong with contacting O’Connell and urging that he minimize the cuts as much as possible for CSD, say “no downsizing,” and so forth in a calm, respectful way. If you have direct ties (you are a hearing businessperson in Fremont,  you graduated from CSD, you have children at CSD, you’re a community member in California, you’re related to someone from CSD, and so on), mention that. It cannot hurt for the California Department of Education (CDE) to hear that CSD is important just the way it is, without changing/downsizing. In fact, it could even help us in other areas.

We may need to do this more than once over the next several months, but we are remaining calm and encouraging respectful action above all.

Thanks, everyone.

shared by Jenny Cantrell, alumnae and community member 





Jack O’Connell’s “Guarantee” to send Deaf Kids Home!

12 01 2008

(Note: This is not a transcript of the above vlog. It is different.) Yesterday (January 10, 2008), Jack O’Connell was interviewed by local radio station, KGO-AM 810, on the 6 pm show. California is facing a severe budget crisis and the governor has proposed across the board cuts. For information on what these proposed cuts look like, click on the San Francisco Chronicle and Fremont Argus articles in the “Articles” column on the right side.

KGO-AM does not provide transcripts, but a hearing person typed this partial transcript so we can see O’Connell’s exact words, and they are bone-chilling. They do not say he will close CSD Fremont, CSD Riverside, nor the School for the Blind, but they promise to harm Deaf education in the state of California.The following partial transcript, taken from the interview in sections that relate to CSD:

“We’re looking at a 4.8 Billion dollar proposed reduction for both this year and next year, cumulatively, that’s k thru 14. That translates into about 800 dollars less per student this year than last year. That translate (sic) to about $1900.00 below what other states are doing in terms of number of dollars going per student. For the State Department of Education, we run special schools; your schools in Fremont for the blind and the deaf, and I can guarantee you we’ll be sending students home.”

“The smart approach to this is setting priorities and when you just slash 10 % across the board you’re saying every program is of equal value and I don’t believe that to be the case and I think there are some programs that you are going to make a significant investment in and there are some programs that, yes – maybe you can consolidate and reduce and be a able to survive. Not releasing over 20,000 felons, not whacking public education so we will be laying off teachers. I guarantee you, teachers will be laid off. I’m running the State Schools in California I can guarantee you there will be students sent home. Our blind and hearing impaired students are going to be sent home if this budget stays in place.”

(end transcript)

If this information upsets, saddens, or terrifies you, please watch this site for the action plan. There was an emergency community meeting this afternoon. We have a plan, but we need your help. This means all of you with a stake in CSD, including alumni, parents of students/former students, hearing people with a connection to CSD, Deaf community members (both local and worldwide), et cetera. Please keep an eye on this site for further information via blog/vlog entries.Onward and upward for the sake of Deaf children in California!

shared by Cat Cassidy, alumnae, parent, and community member and by Jenny Cantrell, alumnae and community member, with technical video assistance by Joey Baer, community member





Minutes From Today’s Meeting

11 01 2008

Emergency Meeting took place at the amphitheatre on January 11, 2006 2008 at 2 pm

Bridgetta Bourne-Firl opened the meeting saying she knows we all are scared and what Jack O’Connell said on the radio was scary. When reading the transcript of the interview with Jack O’Connell, we do not know exactly what he meant however; we do know that it is scary.

Bridgetta quoted Jack O’Connell’s two points that has the community wanting to take action and the two things were 1) “I guarantee you that deaf and blind kids will GO home” and 2) “I guarantee you that teachers will be laid off” and his guarantee is based on the budget cut that California State is looking into.

Bridgetta then gave the floor to David Eberwein explaining the “Game Plan” for this situation.

When David got on the floor, he said he was shocked. When he first read the transcript, he was shocked then filled with fear and thought of his home, job and nearly panicked. But then, he allowed himself some time to think some more and calm down. He realized, after analyzing, that we must take action. He explained that the budget cut is happening because everyone wants money and does not want to be the one that’ll experience the cut. They want someone else to get cut, “not me.”

David then explained that Jack O’Connell must have said it for a reason and there could be two reasons. He presented a chart through a whiteboard on an easel stand. David said Jack’s motive could be either seriously closing the school or about politics.

But first, he wanted to emphasize that CSD is home and what does Jack mean, send the kids home as of send them to CSD? Everyone cheered and agreed. CSD is home to everyone, it always has been home for generations and it will be home for the future generations to come. Therefore, CSD has to STAY open.

David then explained his chart on the whiteboard, which were split between A and B explaining Jack’s possible “tactics” when making his guarantees.

Possible Reason A, CSD will close for real but we cannot allow this to happen. The world watches CSD and if we fight and win, we will help everyone involved in the Deaf community. He emphasized that we must protect our home and stick a huge flag into the ground and put a claim on our property- a claim where CSD is here to stay.

David mentioned the transcript part where Jack O’Connell says 20,000 prisoners shouldn’t be freed, and that the public school would keep their budget however, the deaf and blind school will lose theirs. David expressed his indignance that CSD is considered less than the prisoners and that we must object to this type of priorities set by Jack O’Connell.

Continuing his discussion on Reason A, he said we must be prepared to protect ourselves by knowing all possible argument points made by the opposing side. Such as, the opposing side could mention how the Deaf students rate low on test scores therefore, CSD is not effective and not worth keeping. He then switched to Reason B.

Reason B, according to Jack O’Connell’s possible tactics, is politics. Jack possibly said it in the interview to “save” us. Within these tactics, we must act by getting the media involved, have the public aware and show our objections to the legislature and show them that CSD is number one. We have to convince them that we are not less than the prisoners and not less than the public education.

For either Reason A or Reason B, we must have the same action plan and that would be, act NOW. We could hire a professional PR company, hired by the Deaf community, not by CSD. We need to have our objections heard and seen through the news, newspaper, radio and any other means. David mentioned that this is simply a suggestion, but he thinks we should do this.

David said we must have community action even though it may happen a year from now, we need to use this early time frame as an opportunity to start strong with the main goal to show that CSD cannot be touched because it is a banner school!

David wrapped up by saying O’Connell may have had two possible meanings and they are 1) to actually close the school or 2) used his tactics because he trusts in us, a strong community, to fight back and win.

David asked Cat Cassidy to take the floor and explain the people at the rally about what they can do RIGHT now.

Cat Cassidy took the floor. She explained that after the meeting, the rally goers can call Jack O’Connell’s office at this number, 916-319-0800.

She explained the steps:
1) You will reach the CDE
2) Ask for Jack O’Connell or to be transferred to his office
3) If he is not there, ask to leave a message
4) When leaving your message, say you have a Deaf child, or a Deaf relative, or you are a community member and/or alumnae, and to express your concerns about Jack O’Connell’s comments/apparent threat.

Cat emphasized that you shouldn’t call as a teacher or as a staff member, because it would cheapen the purpose of your objections, since they could argue that you just want to keep your job. Our main goal is to object for the sake of our children’s future.

Another thing we could do, Cat added, was to spread the word and have the friends and all stakeholders make the calls as well. Be active and make sure everyone is actively involved.

Cat Cassidy gave the floor to Bridgetta Bourne-Firl. Bridgetta opened the forum by saying there would be ten minutes for the public to come and discuss or express concerns or to ask questions.

Person # 1 asked if anybody has personally talked with Jack O’Connell to ask him for clarification?

Bridgetta wanted to know if she meant a parent, a community member or someone officially from the school? Person # 1 clarified and wanted to know if anyone from the school has asked O’Connell. It was explained that no employees from CSD are allowed to do that, since we are subordinate to the California Department of Education.

Person # 2 said it does not matter if Jack’s words was a political motive, it’s an insult that CSD is a target and something for him to “demean.” Person # 2 also added that she remember years ago California state ran out of funds and were unable to pay state employees. She recalled that the state employees actually had gotten “iou” checks. However, CSD employees were not affected because CSD is written into the state constitution. She wishes to know how this type of information would be of help in this current situation?

Person # 3 came up to explain that CSD is indeed written into the constitution, as each state is required to have a Deaf residential program. She then explained that CSD is not the only Deaf school in California, therefore, the closing of CSD can happen. She then added that we should not focus on the ‘closing of CSD,’ but rather, focus on taking action plans now to show that nobody can mess with CSD and our community.

Person # 4 came up and said we need to make sure we are calm and not blow things out of proportion. We need to take action, but not to lose our heads.

David Eberwein got up to explain that we still need to take action plan to protect ourselves and to make it clear that this school cannot be touched.

Person # 5 came up and shared that he read through the Argus news that Prop 98 is supposed to protect the school and should not cut the budget. He also said there would be a final budget decision next Thursday. (it was unclear whether this meant that the governor’s proposal would be final or if the Legislature would have made a final vote)

David Eberwein then said we have to investigate that over the weekend to check it out.

Person # 6 came to make an emphasis that we have to say we are taking action plan as a community member, not as staff or teachers because CDE is strict about this type of thing, because CDE employees shouldn’t be “speaking against CDE” or taking action during work hours.

Person # 7 wanted to start now with vlogs saying it would spread the word faster that way and the wider range of community will know what is happening. Person # 7 expressed concern that the number of people at the rally was small, it has to be bigger than this to be effective.

David Eberwein said the main thing now is to just to do it, take action now and that we need to have the same ‘sign’ points to be on the same page. He also added that the comments made by Jack O’Connell were wrong.

Person # 8 discussed two things; first she thinks we should involve other Deaf organizations such as CAD and DCARA to make this stronger. Then she added that when finding out and sharing with her friends, a lot of them said “oh this has happened before” and she’s concerned that people will think we are crying wolf. We need to make sure that those people know that it’s for REAL.

Person # 9 said we shouldn’t limit to Deaf community only, we should involve the entire community of Fremont because CSD is one of the largest facility that has the highest number of employees. If closing the school, it will greatly affect the community, business and the city in general.

Person # 10 wanted to point out person # 8’s “cry wolf” comments. He said CSD has had threats and CSD fought them and won. It’s not like we cried wolf, it has actually happened. So this situation isn’t “crying wolf.”

Person # 11 said he’s going to Sacramento tomorrow for a regional meeting. He said he tried having some of his friends join but some made excuses such as, oh I have a football game, etc. He said to go tomorrow, to watch and listen and make clarifications if needed. We need to have more people involved for a louder voice.

Person # 12 said we have to act now and fight now like the Civil Rights movement. If something racial was said, it’d be immediately brought to attention and actions would be taken in an instant. She said we need to treat this situation like that.

Bridgetta had to stop the open forum and Cat Cassidy wrapped up by explaining what could be done. To call Jack O’Connell, to forward everyone in the community the transcript of the interview made by Jack O’Connell and asked everyone to go to the APTC meeting on Tuesday to discuss further for parental involvement and a possible establishment of the Task Force. Several people then gathered to follow through on some of the suggestions made above, including this website.

shared by Clare Cassidy, alumni, parent, and community member